Thus far I’ve not written on hell because it’s actually not a central component of the gospel.
Of course, to listen to many Christians, you wouldn’t know that. The version of the gospel they preach is thoroughly afterlife-focused: Because of sin, when we die we’re going to hell; but thanks to Jesus, when Christians die we’re going to heaven, and that’s the good news that the bible teaches. But while that’s certainly good news to anyone who’s afraid of hell, the gospel Jesus preached
Hell has become a controversial topic lately, what with Rob Bell’s book Love Wins trying to explain what he thinks hell consists of, and other Christians pitching a fit that it’s not orthodox theology. I’m not going to review that book here; I’m just going to focus on what the scriptures teach about it.
The burning pool: Not hell.
Most people’s idea of hell consists of a lake of fire and sulfur into which sinners will get thrown at the End. For some reason (which I’ll get to), they also figure when sinners die before the End, they go to an underworld variation of this lake. While they don’t actually say this, the loose idea is when they die they go to hell. Then at some point at the End, they get a one-day furlough from hell, in which they stand before God and get judged… and then get tossed right back into hell. Sucks to be them.
But nowhere in the scriptures is this lake (really, pool) called hell.
The words we translate “hell.”
Hell. The Saxon word hel originally came from Norse mythology. This is why some folks claim the idea of hell itself came from Norse mythology, not Judaism nor Christianity. But that’s false. Hell has been taught by Christians long before we ever evangelized the Norse. When we taught the Norse and the Saxons about what the Romans called infernus, we borrowed their word hel. Trouble is, there are a lot of gaps in our knowledge about infernus, and just as the Romans filled in the gaps with Roman myths, the Norse filled in the gaps with Norse myths.
Sheol (Sh’ol) (regularly mispronounced
Gehenna (Ge Hinnóm) (Greek, ge’enna/“gehenna”). This literally means “valley of Hinnom,” and refers to the landfill outside Jerusalem. In Jesus’s day, it was the place you burnt trash. When Jesus taught about plucking out eyes and cutting off hands, lest one go to Ge Hinnóm,
Hades (Hádis). The Greek word for the underworld, “hades” in English, was used to translate sh’ól by the folks who translated the Old Testament into Greek. Of course, it has its own baggage from Greek mythology.
Tartarus (Tártaros). The lowest part of hades was Tartaros, a pit of eternal torment, where Zeus put anybody who really pissed him off. And Simon Peter used the verb-form of this word (tartaró’o/“to put someone into Tartaros”) to describe what God did to sinning angels.
One of the afterlife’s levels.
I wrote elsewhere on the afterlife. Briefly, there’s not a lot about it in the bible, because Jews and Christians’ emphasis is on resurrection. The afterlife is temporary. God will make us alive again.
But other religions had an afterlife, and some of their ideas leaked into the Pharisees’ beliefs. By Jesus’s time, the Pharisees believed it wasn’t an underworld, but an overworld: Your corpse went into the ground, but your spirit went to heaven. But not the heaven where God is: God was much too holy for that. Instead, the Pharisees taught there were 10 heavens. (God’s in the tenth.)
In the non-scriptural book of 2 Enoch, there’s a huge section where Enoch got to visit all 10 heavens. Here’s what he found:
- Angels, 200 of them, managing the stars, snow, and dew.
- Apostate angels, kept in torment. (Possibly this is the “outer darkness” Jesus spoke about.
- Paradise. The Garden of Eden, kept “between corruptibility and incorruptibility.” [2 Enoch 8.5] On its north side was a special place of torment for the wicked, as Jesus described in his story of Lazarus and the wealthy man.
- The sun, the moon, 8,000 stars, and 150,000 angels. (But only 1,000 angels at night. Maybe they sleep.)
- A prison for evil watchers.
Da 4.13, 23In the Enoch books, watchers were the “sons of God” who interbred with humans and produced the Nephilim. Ge 6.1-4According to 2 Enoch and other myths, Enoch told God on them, and this trip through the heavens was part of his reward.
- Other scary angels.
- The seasons and times of the year.
- The zodiac.
- God himself.
Now, 2 Enoch isn’t bible. We have no idea how accurate any of it is. But the New Testament writers knew of it; particularly Paul, a Pharisee himself. When Paul wrote about some fellow who visited the third heaven,
What is in the bible is this odd story Jesus tells of the afterlife. It may be a parable; it may be about actual people Jesus knew. Regardless, here it is.
“A certain person was wealthy, dressed in purple and fine linen, everyday just brilliant. A certain poor personnamed Lazarus, covered in whip-marks, was thrown at his gate, wanting to eat what fell from the wealthy man’stable, but only the dogs emerged; they licked his wounds. The poor mandied, and was carried off by the angels to Abraham’s lap. “The wealthy mandied, was buried, and lifting his eyes in the afterlife, historture beginning, he saw Abraham far away, and Lazarus on his lap. He shouted to him, ‘Father Abraham! Have mercy on me! Send Lazarus, so he can dip his fingertip in water and cool my tongue; I’m tortured by this fire!’ Abraham said, ‘Child, remember: You received your good in your lifetime. Lazarus, likewise, evil. Now here, he receives comfort, and you, torture. In any case, there’s a vast chasm fixed between us and you: Those who want to cross over there to any of you, can’t. Nor can any of you cross over here to us.’ “ The wealthy mansaid, ‘Then I ask you this, Father. Send him to my father’s house—for I have five brothers—so he can testify about this, so they won’t also come to this place of torture.’ Abraham said, ‘They have Moses and the Prophets. Listen to them.’ The wealthy mansaid, ‘No, Father Abraham!—when someone from the dead goes to them, they’ll repent!’ Abrahamtold him, ‘If they don’t listen to Moses and the Prophets, they won’t be persuaded even when someone rises from the dead.’”
Luke 16.19-31 KWL
Some things to notice in this story:
- Both died and went to the afterlife. But there are different parts of it: Abraham’s lap (often translated “Abraham’s bosom,” literally “Abraham’s womb”); and torment, with flames and no water, as much like Ge Hinnom as you could picture.
- There was an obstacle separating them, but Abraham could still talk to the rich man, for they were in the same place.
- Neither could leave. Abraham couldn’t send Lazarus to the rich man, and wouldn’t send him to the rich man’s family.
Jesus’s story is pretty much all we have on the afterlife. The rest are hints. We know God, who’s everywhere, is just as much there as anywhere.
However, Christians hate the idea that when we die, we won’t be standing directly in God’s physical presence, or giving Jesus a big weepy hug. So we’ve invented unscriptural myths which teach otherwise. Again, they’re in my article on the afterlife.
But after the resurrection, there’s judgment. At some point Jesus will sort us out like sheep and goats,
Christians have a lot of problems with the burning pool idea. Probably our biggest problem is the large number of Christians who don’t have a problem with the idea: It’s totally fine with them if people are tossed into eternal torment. Such people, they figure, are only getting their just desserts. They could’ve chosen Jesus; they could’ve accepted God’s offer of eternal life; but no, they were willing to live forever in freakish howling misery. So fine. No mercy for them.
There is something profoundly wrong with people if the idea of eternal torment doesn’t bother them in the slightest. Which is probably God’s point: He wants us to care. He gave us the worst consequence we could imagine, in part as a motivation to not go there.
Still, the burning pool sounds to many people like overkill: How does a finite number of sins merit infinite punishment? It makes God sound infinitely unfair. Most arguments against it are the usual, “If I were God, I’d do it this way…” followed by some system which eventually gets people out of the pool. In their systems, even the devil gets paroled in the end. (But not Adolf Hitler. ’Cause f--- that guy.)
And even if we don’t invent some system which makes the burning pool less than forever, Christians have tried to fudge our way around the idea: Somehow God will be merciful about it. Or somehow these folks really do deserve eternal torment. Some of the fudgework consists of the following.
“It wasn’t originally meant for humans.” Many Christians point out the burning pool was created for the devil and its angels,
There are of course problems with this argument. God may not have made the burning pool to torture humans, but he did make it to torture some of his creatures. And what the hell, he’ll use it on humans too. So God really doesn’t come across looking any better. Plus, it makes the whole “I’ll use it on humans!” idea sound like God’s afterthought, which doesn’t say much for his ability to plan ahead.
Yeah, the burning pool was made for the devil. But it was made for unrepentant humans as well.
Purgatory. Extrapolated from 2 Maccabees 12.43-45, where Judas makes a sin offering on behalf of the dead, many Christians believe God gives us yet another chance in the afterlife. Anyone who’s not so twisted or evil as to be beyond saving, is put in a place called “purgatory,” and given a chance to repent.
Now, no church officially teaches this. The Roman Catholics teach purgatory is for believers. Not for almost-good-enoughs. Purgatory is to clean us Christians up before we go to heaven. Our works, after all, will be tested with fire,
Most Protestants (besides not recognizing 2 Maccabees as scripture) point to Jesus’s statement to a dying thief that he was going to Paradise.
Annihilationism. This is the belief that even though the fire is eternal, when you put a human in it, crackle crackle crackle, they burn up and cease to exist. They’re annihilated. This is far more merciful than allowing them to continue to exist, forever, burning.
I admit there is some biblical basis for the idea. The fire is described as eternal and unquenchable, because it can’t be put out: It’s a fire no one can survive. Plus it’s also hard to imagine living happily forever with God, yet knowing family members and loved ones are meanwhile roasting in torment.
But there are plenty of scriptures which indicate an eternal existence in the fire. Not just for the devil,
Universalism. It comes in a lot of varieties, but basically it’s the idea everyone, universally, winds up in heaven.
How’s that work? Well, some universalists believe all the bible passages about hell are myths. Or that God will forgive everyone and let ’em into the Kingdom regardless. Or the burning pool is temporary: People can leave as soon as they come to their senses and repent. (Like C.S. Lewis taught in The Great Divorce.) Or the burning pool is like prison, but everyone gets released once they serve their time.
Yeah, I like the idea of everyone eventually repenting. But I doubt it, human nature being what it is. The other possibility—that God just lets everyone into the Kingdom, either at the End, or after time serviced—also makes heaven much less heavenly: If you don’t want to be there, in what way is it heaven for you? Or will God delete our free will and make us all enjoy heaven, and behave ourselves? You see, universalism creates just as many problems as it solves.
Free will. This belief (honestly, my favorite) reminds us people have free will: We’re given plenty of chances to follow Jesus, whether we know it’s him or not. Ultimately we choose whether to live with God in heaven, or take our chances in the lake. So the torment isn’t so much God’s punishment for sinners: It’s what sinners choose for themselves. Like the line John Milton put in Satan’s mouth in Paradise Lost, “Better to reign in hell, than serve in heaven.” ]263]
The main flaw in the free-will argument is this: If “the door to hell is locked on the inside,” as it’s said, it works both ways. If people chose torment, what’s to say that years (or billions of years) hence they might not choose again, and choose heaven? And thus you have another form of universalism. The burning pool has a revolving door, so to speak.
As in The Great Divorce. Christians love that book because we like Lewis’s descriptions of the sort of people who would choose hell. But we dismiss the ramifications of people being able to choose heaven after they die.
If you jumped to the “conclusions” part ’cause you’re hoping I’ll summarize all the wordy theology above, then tell you what to think, you don’t know me very well.
Instead I remind you: The focus of Christianity is the Kingdom. Not hell, nor avoiding hell, or having “afterlife insurance,” or “eternal fire insurance,” as one of my former pastors jokingly called it. The focus of the gospel is not on dodging hell by attaining heaven. It is not carrot-and-stick. It is all carrot. Yeah, there’s a stick, but it’s not there to motivate us to follow Jesus. It’s there to motivate us to preach the gospel to the lost before the stick hits them.
The Christians who focus on hell are the Christians who don’t appreciate the Kingdom, or even know the gospel is about the Kingdom. (’Cause they’ve been taught it’s about dodging hell.) For them, preaching hellfire seems to work, and it’s far easier to bash evil than preach sanctification, so they’ll stick to hellfire. It’s a very unhealthy way to look at God, and it produces lousy fruit.
We should know about hell, but since we’re not destined to dwell in it, there’s no reason to dwell on it.